[Openchrome-users] Some general questions

Bilderbeek, Manuel manuel.bilderbeek
Fri Mar 24 06:34:40 PST 2006


Hi,

> pb with the primary dns machine

OK, I'll keep trying then.
 
> 6.8.2 is old, very, very old... I guess nobody remembers...

Well, thanks for your answers anyway!
 
> >>1) what is supported in the driver in Xorg 6.8.2? I saw 
> there is a via
> >>driver and also the unichrome_dri stuff is in it.
> >>
> via driver in xorg 6.8.2 is unichrome r30. see unichrome.sf.net.

Ah, this is the 'old branch' stuff at unichrome.sf.net.

It might be a bit sensitive, but what is the relation between the
unichrome project on sf.net and the OpenChrome project? It seems like
first the stuff from the former was entering Xorg and nowadays the
latter stuff goes into Xorg. Why?

> Don't remember about 3D, might even be completely broken, 
> really don't 
> remember... xorg 6.8.2 contains something like mesa 6.2.x

Is there a difference in 2D features you think? (Maybe not all 2D ops
were accelerated yet or so?)
 
> >>2) how is the 2D and 3D performance of the driver in Xorg 6.8.2,
> >>compared to 6.9 and the current SVN?
> >>
> 3D at least has seen a complete rewrite since 6.8.2. Support is much 
> better now.

Any idea about 2D?

> 2D will only need 800x600x16 bits so 8Mb will be enough

OK.

> >>4) in Xorg 6.8.2 I found both a unichrome_dri.so and a via_dri.so.
> >>What's the difference and how do I specify which one to use, if
> >>necessary? AFAIK I can only set the driver to 'via' in the 
> >>Xorg.conf and
> >>via_drv determines which dri module to load.
> >>
> via_dri.so is even older than unichrome_dri.so

How do I make sure that the proper one is loaded? If via_dri.so isn't
used, why is it in Xorg?
 
> >>As you may have noticed, I'm stuck with Xorg 6.8.2 for now and I'm
> >>trying to grok what this means for me. Plus some additional 
> things I'm
> >>not understanding yet :)

> why are you stuck ? I agree that moving to 7.0 (modular) is a lot of 
> work, but 6.9 is not that different than 6.8.2. You can 
> easily patch in 
> openchrome in either one and make some updated packages, 
> while still not 
> breaking dependancies.

I'm supposed to show that hardware acceleration (at least 2D, preferably
3D as well) can work on MontaVista Linux 4.0.1, which comes with Xorg
6.8.2 and a 2.6.10 kernel.
So, I compiled the via DRM kernel module for 2.6.10 (got the sources
from some site, but it seems to load fine) and I tweaked the source RPM
for Xorg (6.8.2) from MontaVista to use the via driver. So far, it
doesn't seem to use the DRI at all. Still working on it..
(Any ideas welcome!)

Is there some HOWTO or guide that shows me how to "patch in OpenChrome"
in Xorg 6.9, e.g.? I assume you mean the latest SVN version?

--
Kind regards,

Manuel Bilderbeek

This message and attachment(s) are intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  
If you are not the intended recipient or agent thereof responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  
If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and with a "reply" message.  
Thank you for your cooperation.






More information about the Openchrome-users mailing list