[Openchrome-users] Your message to openchrome-users awaits moderator approval

[Forest Bond]

Hi,

First, a brief message from my SPAM filter, which is apparently not happy with a
few things:

> Spam detection software, running on the system "storm.local.network", has
> identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
> similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
> the administrator of that system for details.

[...]

> Content analysis details:   (1.9 points, 1.0 required)
> 
>  pts rule name              description
> ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
>  0.0 FH_HOST_EQ_VERIZON_P   Host is pool-.+verizon.net
>  0.9 RCVD_IN_PBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
>                             [71.169.171.209 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
>  0.9 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL      RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
>                             [71.169.171.209 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
>  0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
>                             [score: 0.4925]
>  0.1 RDNS_DYNAMIC           Delivered to trusted network by host with
>                             dynamic-looking rDNS

My settings are a little on the aggressive side.  I will bump the required
points up a bit.  Still, thought you should know.

On to other things...

On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 04:09:45PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> Looks like the board is an MSI Fuzzy CX700/CX700D. Right ?

Yes:

http://www.logicsupply.com/products/ms_9802

> The driver you are using is too old. Please update to latest svn from trunk 
> and send another xorg log.

Okay, I will do that a bit later today.

> As your first mail never made it to the list, what is your issue exactly ?

On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 03:20:22PM -0500, Forest Bond wrote:
> I'm seeing display artifacts with a 42" Samsung plasma display.  I don't see
> any issues with a standard LCD or CRT display.  It appears to be an
> interaction between the VGA BIOS and the driver?
>
> Attached is a sample X log file (a different display than the Samsung, but
> very similar issue), as well as the X configuration.
>
> My driver version is svn 462.  I am not explicitly loading the VBE module, so
> I'm a little confused about the magic.
>
> The display has a native resolution of 1024x720, but I am currently driving it
> at 800x600, which it is auto-scaling.

I should point out that I've seen the same issue both with the openChrome driver
and the vesa driver.  I believe this to be an issue with the VGA BIOS.  I wasn't
sure if the openChrome driver might have some options for coercing the VGA BIOS
into doing the right thing.

Thanks for any assistance you can provide.

-Forest
-- 
Forest Bond
http://www.alittletooquiet.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://wiki.openchrome.org/pipermail/openchrome-users/attachments/20080114/616f6a6a/attachment-0001.bin