[OpenFontLibrary] OFL problems, IPA License annoyances

Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Wed Apr 8 00:51:41 PDT 2009



Le Mar 7 avril 2009 20:53, Alexandre Prokoudine a écrit :
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>> And as I said, I would prefer to avoid a new version of OFL until
>> there is a real world example of the OFLv1.1 being defective; until
>> then, the FAQ updates are the best response.
>
> Amen to that? :)

I don't want this to turn into a flamewar, but consider that new font
projects are being started all the time. They're choosing their
license now. Later for the usual reasons it will be very difficult to
make them switch. It would be much nicer for them if they could start
with an OFL version everyone agreed was solid (even if the
disagreement is not tastefully expressed).

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot



More information about the OpenFontLibrary mailing list