[Openicc] maximum colour conformity
Kai-Uwe Behrmann
ku.b at gmx.de
Sun Apr 15 23:11:55 PDT 2007
Am 14.04.07, 23:13 +1000 schrieb Graeme Gill:
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > I think that this depends entirely on the application requirements. Always
> > converting to a properly-designed "working" colorspace prior to processing
> > ensures that options and algorithms produce visually consistent results.
>
> Well an application can certainly operate this way, but it will
> not be regarded very seriously by those interested in image
> fidelity. Consistency amongst algorithms is a somewhat
> tangential issue. With sufficient care it's possible to have
> algorithms (if one chooses) that operate consistently,
> irrespective of what colorspace the image is stored in.
Users tent to have workflows. Doing things a custom way means doing it
often less aprooved. Converting to a special colour space by hand or
by a set of additional commands is not very nice. Such users are very
likely to have all consistent and convert into on single space.
Does not even some larger picture agencies require one single colour space
for the whole collection?
Staying with that example, I am in doubt a picture agency would be
satisfied with the Home+Office policy. But they had to select or create a
own one, possibly with L-Star/ECI/Adobe RGB as their target.
kind regards
Kai-Uwe Behrmann
--
developing for colour management
www.behrmann.name + www.oyranos.org + www.cinepaint.org
More information about the openicc
mailing list