[Openicc] [argyllcms] Re: CC Profiles In X Specification and dispwin

[Frédéric Crozat]

On Jan 15, 2008 6:24 PM, Kai-Uwe Behrmann <ku.b at gmx.de> wrote:
> Am 15.01.08, 18:11 +0100 schrieb Frédéric Crozat:
>
> > It is a bootstrapping problems :
> >
> > if you want to bootstrap all packages for an application which rely on
> > Oyranos (and not on FLTK)
> > but these packages have enabled UI part because distribution might
> > ship them in a separate sub package,
> > you will need FLTK in the bootstrapping process, even if you don't
> > need it at all.
>
> Yes, I see this pretty often, to need X and similiar packages to build
> commandline tools. But what can I do? (a rethorical question) The
> dependencies will grow. Next is lcms as CMM. Given that FLTK is rather
> small and a fast compilation (around a minute), I'd not think that it is a
> problem. I could easily follow your for a big or slow dependency.

I see it as a problem, if you want to see generation adoption of your
code (and I also consider, as a developer, this kind of split as good
practise).

> If everything is splitted out, I need to write tutorials on how to build
> Oyranos, not how to use it.

Everything = 2 tarballs.

Instructions :
-untar tarball 1
-configure
-make
-make install
-untar tarball 2
-make
-make install

-- 
Frederic Crozat