[Openicc] ALL YOU NEED IS A PROFILE, THE MYTH. (WAS CC Profiles In X Specification and dispwin)

[edmund ronald]

I fully concur. One necessity is to be able to force the backend *with
total certainty* into a known state in which non-regression tests can
be performed eg. by measuring known patchsets on known media. If the
system performance varies, the developers at least should know that,
and end-users would be warned that they need to reprofile. I am
willing to cooperate with anyone who works to create a test-suite.

Edmund

On Jan 19, 2008 12:20 AM, Alastair M. Robinson
<blackfive at fakenhamweb.co.uk> wrote:

> Robert Krawitz wrote:

> > Would that be good enough?
>
> Only if such settings can be applied as part of the backend, and can be
> easily distributed.  As I understand it the need we're trying to solve
> here is to get these settings *right*, then nailed down, so the response
> from a specific model family, paper and ink will be consistent for the
> forseeable future.
>
>
> All the best,
> --
> Alastair M. Robinson
>