[Openicc] Fwd: linearisation targets, Argyll, G7
edmund ronald
edmundronald at gmail.com
Sat Jan 26 17:33:46 PST 2008
Modelling is clearly an option; I simply thought measuring is faster.
The reason I would recommend an interactive tool is that curves speak
wonderfully to the eye - I've seen bugs in measurement appear with
spectacular clarity on the curves :)
Edmund
On Jan 25, 2008 6:02 AM, Graeme Gill <graeme at argyllcms.com> wrote:
> edmund ronald wrote:
>
> > The
> > values here will assist the user in setting up; heuristically, the ink
> > curves by means of an interactive tool which needs to be constructed.
>
> I think it may be possible to setup light ink separation without
> having to resort to an interactive tool.
> The type of thing I've done in the past is to fully model
> and characterize the light & dark ink interaction (ie. a 2D
> model of light + dark, a 3D model for light-light, light + dark),
> and then the separation can be computed with basic parameters
> controlling its characteristic (ie. maximum total ink,
> crossover width, crossover point etc.)
>
>
> Graeme Gill.
> _______________________________________________
> openicc mailing list
> openicc at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/openicc
>
More information about the openicc
mailing list