[Openicc] colord 0.1.0 released!

Robert Krawitz rlk at alum.mit.edu
Mon Jan 17 11:24:23 PST 2011


On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:36:34 +0100 (MET), Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
> Am 17.01.11, 07:45 -0500 schrieb Robert Krawitz:
>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:56:19 +0100 (MET), Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 16.01.11, 22:08 -0500 schrieb Robert Krawitz:
>>>>
>>>> We've been looking at whether and how to identify options that may
>>>> affect the color output.  Many options (including, of course, media
>>>> type, resolution, and color model, but also a lot more) affect the
>>>> color output, but there are other options (such as media size,
>>>> borderless/full bleed, unidirectional/bidirectional head movement)
>>>> that don't.  Would it be useful to be able to flag these options in
>>>> the PPD file somehow, and if so, how?
>>>
>>> http://freedesktop.org/wiki/OpenIcc#PPDcolouring
>>> The above proposal came out of the discussion here on list last august (2010) in the thread "PPD colouring". Its about using a ColorKeyWords in PPDs to mark colour related options.
>>> (That is implemented in Oyranos' CUPS configuration backend.)
>>
>> Now I remember.  Is there any restriction on how many *ColorKeyWords
>> lines there can be, and they can be anywhere in the file?  Neither of
>> those questions is answered in the spec.
>
> I am not aware of such restriction. Thats maybe the reason, why they are not described ;-)
>
>> I want to put one
>>
>> *ColorKeyWords
>>
>> before each such option in the PPD file -- it's simply going to be
>> easier from a coding standpoint.
>
> Seems fine to me.

So is the attached PPD file correct?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/x-gunzip
Size: 4761 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/openicc/attachments/20110117/07bcc6c9/attachment.bin>


More information about the openicc mailing list