[Openicc] colord 0.1.0 released!

Kai-Uwe Behrmann ku.b at gmx.de
Tue Jan 18 00:21:01 PST 2011


Am 17.01.11, 14:24 -0500 schrieb Robert Krawitz:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:36:34 +0100 (MET), Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
>> Am 17.01.11, 07:45 -0500 schrieb Robert Krawitz:
>>> On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:56:19 +0100 (MET), Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Am 16.01.11, 22:08 -0500 schrieb Robert Krawitz:
>>>>>
>>>>> We've been looking at whether and how to identify options that may
>>>>> affect the color output.  Many options (including, of course, media
>>>>> type, resolution, and color model, but also a lot more) affect the
>>>>> color output, but there are other options (such as media size,
>>>>> borderless/full bleed, unidirectional/bidirectional head movement)
>>>>> that don't.  Would it be useful to be able to flag these options in
>>>>> the PPD file somehow, and if so, how?
>>>>
>>>> http://freedesktop.org/wiki/OpenIcc#PPDcolouring
>>>> The above proposal came out of the discussion here on list last august (2010) in the thread "PPD colouring". Its about using a ColorKeyWords in PPDs to mark colour related options.
>>>> (That is implemented in Oyranos' CUPS configuration backend.)
>>>
>>> Now I remember.  Is there any restriction on how many *ColorKeyWords
>>> lines there can be, and they can be anywhere in the file?  Neither of
>>> those questions is answered in the spec.
>>
>> I am not aware of such restriction. Thats maybe the reason, why they are not described ;-)
>>
>>> I want to put one
>>>
>>> *ColorKeyWords
>>>
>>> before each such option in the PPD file -- it's simply going to be
>>> easier from a coding standpoint.
>>
>> Seems fine to me.
>
> So is the attached PPD file correct?

It looks fine. The ColorKeyWords are parsed.


kind regards
Kai-Uwe Behrmann
-- 
developing for colour management 
www.behrmann.name + www.oyranos.org



More information about the openicc mailing list