[Openicc] GoSoC 2011: CPD and target printing
edmundronald at gmail.com
Thu May 5 07:34:58 PDT 2011
You call this an opt-out, I call it the "advanced features workflow". If we
don't make it a standard -but mostly hidden- feature, everyone will leave it
out, targets will need to be printed from command line, this means complex
target layouts will become hell, and the initial profiling of devices will
take x*times as long.
I repeat, I for one will NOT be printing targets (or anything else) from
the command line. I have spent 35 years of my life with computers, I may be
an idiot but I do have a Ph.D which implies a whole lot of programming and
experience of the command line, and I do not repeat NOT intend to print
graphics from the command line. Someone else can do that, you can for all I
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com>wrote:
> On May 5, 2011, at 12:16 AM, Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
> > Am 04.05.11, 20:07 -0600 schrieb Chris Murphy:
> >> On May 4, 2011, at 7:28 PM, edmund ronald wrote:
> >>> Look, you may have a different workflow, and you can have a special
> target printing app for all I care; I would like to be able to print my
> targets from the GIMP.
> >> I think the Gimp will need to implement the opt-out themselves. I remain
> unconvinced the the opt-out mechanism should be in the CPD for every single
> application. I see no reason why the Gimp would not subscribe to this
> opt-out for printing targets or prematched content. That would be the whole
> point of the opt-out system.
> > The "passthrough" should be inherent in the PDF.
> I understand, but it has to get into the PDF via some mechanism. And I
> don't think that UI element should be found in the CPD for every
> Chris Murphy
> openicc mailing list
> openicc at lists.freedesktop.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the openicc