[Openicc] Gutenprint mission as Linux moves towards color managed workflows
rlk at alum.mit.edu
Mon May 14 05:55:26 PDT 2012
On Mon, 14 May 2012 14:37:11 +0200, edmund ronald wrote:
> Maybe I've used too harsh language here - it's not that we don't expose
> the options, it is that some off them should IMHO be placed in a "touch
> only if you really know what you are doing group", so that a user does not
> inadvertently get a bucket of ink running down the front of his
> large-format printer.
We may well want to re-evaluate some of the options when there's
appropriate infrastructure in place.
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:19 PM, edmund ronald <edmundronald at gmail.com>wrote:
>> That is true, but it does apply ink limitation, I think, and
>> ink-limitation is something which domain experts like Jan-Peter Homan will
>> want to retouch for some media.
>> I don't think we should tell people what options they are going to use in
>> the "new"XML-driven Gutenprint, before we have the options we want to
>> expose fully nailed down. And before we are fully willing to migrate those
>> options forward.
Robert Krawitz <rlk at alum.mit.edu>
MIT VI-3 1987 - Congratulations MIT Engineers men's hoops Final Four!
Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2
Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- http://ProgFree.org
Project lead for Gutenprint -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net
"Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works."
More information about the openicc