[packagekit] Proposal to branch to 0.4.x

[Ken VanDine]

works for me

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Richard Hughes <hughsient at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 10:38 -0700, Scott Reeves wrote:
>> What are your thoughts on branching to 0.4.x as soon as 0.3.11 goes
>> live on Monday?  I think the 0.3.x series is now at a very good branch
>> point.
>
> Yes, good idea.
>
>> It appears that Fedora is on about the same timing that a new 0.4.x
>> branch and a locked down 0.3.x branch would benefit you as well,
>> agreed ?
>
> Yes, I'll be updating F9 and F10 to 0.3.11 on Monday, so that would be
> good for Fedora tool.
>
> If nobody complains, I propose on Monday:
>
> * I release 0.3.11
> * I fork master to PACKAGEKIT_0_3_X
> * PACKAGEKIT_0_2_X is marked as obsolete
> * PACKAGEKIT_0_3_X becomes translation and feature frozen and marked as
> stable
>
> Now, you were all sent the rules for the stable branch when I gave you
> commit access, but to go over the rules:
>
>  * No new features in the stable branch
>  * No new API in the stable branch
>  * No cleanup patches in the stable branch
>  * Don't put anything in stable that isn't in master
>  * If you're not sure whether to backport something, ask
>
> If anyone wants any 11th hour string changes before Monday, now would be
> a good time to speak up. :-)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Richard.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PackageKit mailing list
> PackageKit at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit
>



-- 
Ken VanDine
http://ken.vandine.org