[packagekit] Bad license in dummy backend

[Adrien BUSTANY]

Richard Hughes a écrit :
> On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 18:59 +0200, Adrien BUSTANY wrote:
>   
>> I'm using the dummy backend for my unit tests, and
>> backend_get_details 
>> sends back GPL2 as a license, whereas pk-enum.c waits for GPLv2... 
>>     
>
> The licence property is not an enumerated type. The licence type can be
> a composite type such as:
>
> Python and LGPLv2+ and BSD and (MPLv1.1 or GPLv2+)
>
> The best site I've found on this is the Fedora wiki,
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines
>
> I've added a note in the source.
>   
I see... I saw an enum in pk-enum, so I did one in QPackageKit too. My 
point was that backends should either stick to GPL2 or GPLv2, even if 
it's not an enumerated type...
>   
>> Btw, that dummy backend doesn't work at all, I can't manage to install
>> packages with it ;)
>>     
>
> Why? What happens? I use it every day for testing.
>
>   
nevermind, that was a stupid joke :)
> Richard.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PackageKit mailing list
> PackageKit at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/packagekit/attachments/20080929/45e55ac5/attachment-0003.htm>