[packagekit] KPackageKit 0.1 and QPackageKit2 released

[Adrien BUSTANY]

Richard Hughes a écrit :
> On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 15:54 +0200, Adrien BUSTANY wrote:
>   
>
>>  (and I payed great attention to binary compatibility concerns in the
>> lib).
>>     
>
> Cough. I wish I was as good at API and ABI stability.
>
>   
Well, here it's only abstracting all the internal logic into separate 
classes to ensure that the size of the objects won't change, even if I 
have to add internal functions. Nothing more...
>> BTW, I think I'll drop the 2.0 in order to follow PK's versions (it's
>> easier to understand that QPackageKit 0.3.x drives PackageKit 0.3.x).
>> What do you suggest ?
>>     
>
> Yes, you should have 0.3.x else people will get confused. Also you
> should probably host the tarballs somewhere more permanent. You can use
> http://www.packagekit.org/releases/ if you want. Yell if you need a
> hand.
>
>   
You can put that tarball : 
http://maison.mymadcat.com/~madcat/qpackagekit-0.3.tar.gz on the server, 
it's a quite stable release, and covers all the PK API.
>>  Should I contact the package maintainer ?
>>     
>
> I've cc'd him on this email. Steven, can I update the versions of
> packagekit-qt and kpackagekit, or do you want to do it?
>   
Great, thanks
> Richard.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PackageKit mailing list
> PackageKit at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/packagekit/attachments/20080929/3fbd0082/attachment-0003.htm>