[Piglit] [PATCH v3 4/5] Fix too-specific GL version checks in glean
Paul Berry
stereotype441 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 18 12:20:05 PDT 2011
On 14 October 2011 14:33, Brian Paul <brianp at vmware.com> wrote:
> On 10/14/2011 02:15 PM, Paul Berry wrote:
>
>> On 14 October 2011 07:45, Brian Paul <brianp at vmware.com
>> <mailto:brianp at vmware.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/13/2011 02:45 PM, Paul Berry wrote:
>>
>> This patch fixes several version checks in glean that are too
>> specific
>> (e.g. checking that the GL version is 2.x or 3.x when the
>> intent is to
>> make sure the GL version is>= 2.0).
>>
>> We now perform the version check using the piglit-util functions
>> piglit_is_gles() and piglit_get_gl_version() rather than manually
>> inspecting the GL_VERSION string, so this makes the glean
>> tests depend
>> on the piglitutil library.
>>
>>
>> Hmmm, I think it would be cleaner if this was fixed in up-stream
>> glean. It should be trivial to write a glean_get_gl_version().
>> Also, I don't think glean has ever been used with ES so I don't
>> think we need to check for ES in the glean tests (or if we do, it
>> should probably be done everywhere).
>>
>> I don't know when glean was last imported into piglit, but there
>> have been some assorted fixes there.
>>
>> If you can develop a patch, I'd push it there for you.
>>
>> -Brian
>>
>>
>> Oh, I didn't realize glean was being independently maintained. Sure,
>> I'll develop a patch that can be submitted upstream. Where should I
>> send it?
>>
>
>
> There's a glean-dev list hosted on sourceforge. Otherwise, you can just
> send it to me and I'll push it.
>
> -Brian
>
Ok, I sent a patch to you. Are you planning to cherry-pick it over to
Piglit or do you need me to do that?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/piglit/attachments/20111018/1a808fe9/attachment.html>
More information about the Piglit
mailing list