[Piglit] [PATCH] Clarify comment about glIsBuffer behavior

[Matt Turner]

The spec's not vague, it's just stupid. glIsBuffer should return false
between the time a buffer name is generated and first bound.
---
 tests/general/isbufferobj.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/general/isbufferobj.c b/tests/general/isbufferobj.c
index 3938d18..d805818 100644
--- a/tests/general/isbufferobj.c
+++ b/tests/general/isbufferobj.c
@@ -78,10 +78,8 @@ test(void)
    }
 
    /*
-    * The GL spec is vague here.  But the GL man pages say glIsBuffer should
-    * return false in this case.  Mesa and NVIDIA's driver return true.
-    * Generate a warning, not an error, if the driver doesn't follow the
-    * GL docs here.
+    * Generate a warning, not an error, if the driver doesn't return
+    * GL_FALSE from glIsBuffers if the buffer has never been bound.
     */
    if (glIsBuffer(buffers[1])) {
       printf("%s: glIsBuffer(%u) returned true instead of false.\n",
-- 
1.7.12.4