[Piglit] Update some docstrings v2

[Daniel Vetter]

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 07:41:04PM -0700, Dylan Baker wrote:
> [snip]
> > > I'll throw a patch at the end of the series, do you want me to send 
> 
> I'm gonna take it back, sorry. I don't know that dmesg-warn should be 
> worse than warn, (same for fail) since pass -> dmesg-warn, warn -> 
> dmesg-fail, and fail -> dmesg-fail. Personally I was never a fan of having 
> special dmesg- statuses, I feel that a fail is a fail and warn is a warn, but 
> I'm not sure that change is correct.

The current ordering seems wrong to me, e.g. if you have a failing tests
and fix up some dmesg noise you now have a regression.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch