[Piglit] Update some docstrings v2

[Ilia Mirkin]

On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 07:41:04PM -0700, Dylan Baker wrote:
>> [snip]
>> > > I'll throw a patch at the end of the series, do you want me to send
>>
>> I'm gonna take it back, sorry. I don't know that dmesg-warn should be
>> worse than warn, (same for fail) since pass -> dmesg-warn, warn ->
>> dmesg-fail, and fail -> dmesg-fail. Personally I was never a fan of having
>> special dmesg- statuses, I feel that a fail is a fail and warn is a warn, but
>> I'm not sure that change is correct.
>
> The current ordering seems wrong to me, e.g. if you have a failing tests
> and fix up some dmesg noise you now have a regression.

And if you add dmesg noise, you have a fix :) printk(), here I come!

On a mildly note, am I the only one who thinks it's weird that
transitions to/from (skip, notrun) are considered fixes/regressions?

  -ilia