[Piglit] Seperate NOTRUN and SKIP from fixes and regressions

[Dylan Baker]

Cool, I was mostly hoping that you and Daniel would look at them and see if 
they worked for you and didn't break your workflow.

- Dylan

On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 02:34:57 Marek Olšák wrote:
> I cannot review this, because I'm not familiar with the code, but the
> last patch looks good to me and I like the overall idea.
> 
> Marek
> 
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Dylan Baker <baker.dylan.c at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> > This series separates the SKIP and NOTRUN status changes from fixes and
> > regressions and puts them into separate categories, enabled and
> > disabled.
> > 
> > This makes two workflows possible where previously only one was:
> > 1) creating baselines that are full tests, and then using small focused
> > 
> >    runs to compare specific tests
> > 
> > 2) running full comparisons, and being able to see when new tests are
> > 
> >    enabled or tests are disabled
> > 
> > Patches 1-3 add test to demonstrate current behavior or to model future
> > behavior
> > 
> > Patch 4 makes NOTRUN and SKIP a special subclass which when compared
> > using numerics (not == or !=) will resolve False
> > 
> > Patch 5 Plumbs it all in
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/piglit/attachments/20140318/e3fcda0d/attachment.sig>