[Piglit] [RFC] Trying to fix dmabuf/yuv tests

Rob Clark robdclark at gmail.com
Wed Sep 7 19:13:18 UTC 2016

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 6 September 2016, Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Kristian Høgsberg <hoegsberg at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > If we have the gbm eglimage path, why do we keep the intel specific code
>> > around?
>> only plausible reason I could come up with is that gbm path depends on
>> a fairly recent version of gbm to have the gbm_bo_map/unmap() bits..
>> if that isn't an issue, we should drop the intel path.  Otherwise we
>> should plan on eventually dropping intel path.
> Unless things have changed over the last few hours, none of the classic dri
> drivers expose map/unmap image.

well, someone should fix that for i965 if it is still missing,
otherwise i965 won't be able to use gralloc-gbm for android.

Other classic drivers, I doubt it matters.  Do any of them support
dma-buf in the first place?


More information about the Piglit mailing list