[Piglit] [RFC] Trying to fix dmabuf/yuv tests
emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Wed Sep 7 19:07:55 UTC 2016
On Tuesday, 6 September 2016, Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Kristian Høgsberg <hoegsberg at gmail.com
> > If we have the gbm eglimage path, why do we keep the intel specific code
> only plausible reason I could come up with is that gbm path depends on
> a fairly recent version of gbm to have the gbm_bo_map/unmap() bits..
> if that isn't an issue, we should drop the intel path. Otherwise we
> should plan on eventually dropping intel path.
> Unless things have changed over the last few hours, none of the classic
dri drivers expose map/unmap image.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Piglit