[Pixman] [PATCH 2/5] vmx: adjust macros when loading vectors on ppc64le

Oded Gabbay oded.gabbay at gmail.com
Wed Jul 1 23:42:11 PDT 2015


On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:41:37 +0300
> Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:27:59 +0300
>> > Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> From: Fernando Seiti Furusato <ferseiti at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >>
>> >> Replaced usage of vec_lvsl to direct unaligned assignment
>> >> operation (=). That is because, according to Power ABI Specification,
>> >> the usage of lvsl is deprecated on ppc64le.
>> >>
>> >> Changed COMPUTE_SHIFT_{MASK,MASKS,MASKC} macro usage to no-op for powerpc
>> >> little endian since unaligned access is supported on ppc64le.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Fernando Seiti Furusato <ferseiti at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  pixman/pixman-vmx.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> >>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/pixman/pixman-vmx.c b/pixman/pixman-vmx.c
>> >> index 23537f6..7e5eca7 100644
>> >> --- a/pixman/pixman-vmx.c
>> >> +++ b/pixman/pixman-vmx.c
>
>> > Looks like you also modified Fernando's original patch, yet your name
>> > is nowhere to be seen. It's common courtesy to note what you changed.
>> >
>> I think I only took part of his patch, and that part I did *not*
>> modify, but I will double check it, and if I indeed modified
>> something, I will comment about it.
>> btw, I wrote a comment about it in the cover letter.
>
> Cover letters do not go into git history. "Credit where credit is due",
> in both good and bad, and if someone is digging for "blame", then he
> looks in the git history. That's why we do commit messages like:
>
> blah blah
>
> S-o-b: A. Author
> [B: frobbed the bar]
> S-o-b: B. Author
>
> It's more of a "netiquette" thing, I believe. Also, Fernando's patch
> did not include the whitespace damage, you added that, so it's not nice
> to account that to him. ;-)
>
I fixed that in the new patch series that I sent.

   Oded

>> > The above were the comments that finally made me not just push this
>> > series.
>> Not sure I understood this sentence. Could you please elaborate ?
>
> Just referring to my review comments about whitespace.
>
>
> Thanks,
> pq


More information about the Pixman mailing list