[Pm-utils] Some thoughts about some of the hooks

[Richard Hughes]

On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 19:58 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> But if it is or not, pm hooks should be doing this, not g-p-m, because
> (at least according to plan) it will be common to use NM independently
> of the desktop.

Agree. When HAL depends on pm-utils, and g-p-m depends on this new HAL,
then I can rip the code out of g-p-m.

Richard.