[Pm-utils] Some thoughts about some of the hooks
hmacht at suse.de
Wed Oct 11 01:23:35 PDT 2006
On Tue 10. Oct - 19:58:03, Peter Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 17:18 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > > - shouldn't the "session daemons" actually do this? Send a "going to suspend"
> > > signal which NM (and others) will listen to?
> > gnome-power-manager currently does this, but it NetworkManager doesn't
> > mind being asked twice.
> Hrm. Actually, that may be a source of some bugs. Not 100% sure
> though, let me think about it some more.
> But if it is or not, pm hooks should be doing this, not g-p-m, because
> (at least according to plan) it will be common to use NM independently
> of the desktop.
See my other mail, also without X you have some kind of session and need a
pm app to care about Policy.
More information about the Pm-utils