[Pm-utils] Re: Newer version of pm-utils?

[Richard Hughes]

On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 20:09 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> I think that this should of course be handled by s2ram - bypassing the
> internal whitelist if you want.

Hmm. I think s2ram (or any "action" program) should just do the suspend
and let pm-utils do all the other "stuff".

> If not, this should be the very last hook that runs before suspend,
> thus not
> being 20video but
> 99ZZvideo.

Agreed.

Richard.