[Pm-utils] Re: Newer version of pm-utils?

Tim Dijkstra newsuser at famdijkstra.org
Thu Feb 8 00:59:11 PST 2007

On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 19:32:59 +0000
Richard Hughes <hughsient at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 20:09 +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > I think that this should of course be handled by s2ram - bypassing the
> > internal whitelist if you want.
> Hmm. I think s2ram (or any "action" program) should just do the suspend
> and let pm-utils do all the other "stuff".

And why is that? s2ram is a binary that collects all the quirks you
could want to do to get your video back again. That is the whole idea
of its existence. Why would you want to split that up?

grts Tim

More information about the Pm-utils mailing list