[Pm-utils] [PATCH] Better PMU

[Victor Lowther]

On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 22:39 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2008/3/16, Victor Lowther <victor.lowther at gmail.com>:
> > On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 19:04 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >  > Hi,
> >  >
> >  > I improved the pmu support a bit (for uswsusp/kernel)
> >  >
> >  > - If /dev/pmu is existent, assume we can suspend
> >  > - Don't try to run pm-pmu for non-pmu machines. The majority of
> >  > machines nowadays doesn't have a pmu, so always running pm-pmu for
> >  > them is just wasting cpu cycles.
> >
> >
> > Patch?
> 
> Argh, missed it. Attached now.

Patch looks good to me.  

> I haven't changed do_suspend for uswsusp, as my uswsusp patch will use
> s2ram (which deals with pmu machines transparently).
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
-- 
Victor Lowther
Ubuntu Certified Professional