[poppler] qt/qt4 config checks, use pkgconfig

[Rex Dieter]

Brad Hards wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 December 2006 14:23, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> Cleanup of the m4 code.
>> OK, easy,
>> rm -f m4/qt.m4
>>
>> (:
> You don't want Qt3 poppler bindings any more?
> :-?

My patch used pkg-config for qt3 too.  Though, not everyone likely has 
pkg-config and/or qt properly configured for that, it would likely break 
previously working setups if the legacy config checks for qt3 were 
dropped. ):

I'll respin a new patch that simply prefers pkg-config, and falls back 
to the old checks in case of failure.  Does that sound (more) acceptable?

>>> Also, can you check that the unittests build and pass with your patch? I
>>> had to do some change to the linker lines, but I don't remember if that
>>> was for the PKG_CONFIG stuff, or because I merged the tests for Qt and
>>> QtTest together (because QtTestLib was included into Qt 4.1, so it didn't
>>> make much sense to test separately at this stage).
>> I have yet to confirm it, but the tests should be better off with my
>> approach, since I kept the QtTest bits separate instead of lumping it
>> together with the other libs as you did.
> Test, please.

will do.

-- Rex