[poppler] pdftohtml, separate CSS file

[Josh Richardson]

On second thought, what if I provide the old behavior via a switch?  I
think that the separate CSS file is the better default behavior.

Thanks, --josh

On 6/22/11 11:15 AM, "Josh Richardson" <jric at chegg.com> wrote:

>Ok, will do.  --josh
>
>On 6/22/11 12:59 AM, "Albert Astals Cid" <aacid at kde.org> wrote:
>
>>A Wednesday, June 22, 2011, Josh Richardson va escriure:
>>> Experienced web developers always separate their CSS from their HTML
>>>file 
>>> This makes maintenance and overriding of the styling much easier, as
>>>well
>>> as keeping the HTML file itself (nearly) completely content / semantics
>>> focused.
>>> 
>>> In the complex mode, I would like to separate out the styling into a
>>> separate CSS file, referenced from the output HTML file.  Any
>>>objections
>>> to this?
>>
>>I'd prefer if you added this through a flag other than modifying the
>>behaviour 
>>(since people always complain when you change the behavoiur of something)
>>
>>> 
>>> I am also cleaning up the tags so that they are all balanced and XHTML,
>>> hence XML-compliant.
>>
>>Makes sense, but please make this a separate patch.
>>
>>Albert
>>
>>> Once this is done along with CSS separated out, I'm
>>> not sure of a need for a separate ­xml mode for pdftohtml.  Thoughts on
>>> this?
>>> 
>>> Thanks, --josh
>>_______________________________________________
>>poppler mailing list
>>poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
>>http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>poppler mailing list
>poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
>http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
>