[poppler] Adding a Beta 3 to 0.20?

[Thomas Freitag]

Am 09.04.2012 22:02, schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
> El Dilluns, 9 d'abril de 2012, a les 20:59:54, Thomas Freitag va escriure:
>> Am 02.04.2012 23:33, schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
>>> El Divendres, 30 de març de 2012, a les 10:49:25, Thomas Freitag va
> escriure:
>>>> Am 29.03.2012 22:15, schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
>>>>> As you all see i just released poppler 0.19.2 as the schedule mandated.
>>>>>
>>>>> This means that theoretically the feature freeze is upon us.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to ask for a Beta 3 in two weeks (i.e. effectively delaying
>>>>> the release of 0.20 by two weeks) so we could sneak in two features that
>>>>> are done as of today but have not been released as part of 0.19.2 since
>>>>> *I* did not have time to review them properly.
>>>>>
>>>>> The features are I want to include in Beta 3 are:
>>>>>     * Fabio's annot work
>>>>>     * My form-reset work
>>>>>
>>>>> Opinions?
>>>> If nobody cares about it, do You think You'll have the time to look at
>>>> the DeviceN support in splash, too? It's a quite huge patch, so I
>>>> wouldn't care if You want to wait until the release of 0.20... But it is
>>>> worth the effort, see i.e. the attached examples from the ghent group.
>>>> To clearify what it means, I open a new thread and mail a beta release
>>>> of the patch.
>>> After having a look at the patch I'd prefer to defer it to 0.22, the patch
>>> is huge and most importantly touches crucial parts of the code (aka Gfx*
>>> and Splash) while Fabio's and my patches are much more less core (annots
>>> and forms refinements).
>>>
>>> I hope it's ok for you.
>> The just uploaded patch for the CMYK support also infects the DeviceN
>> support, because it's a copy&  paste there (and need therefore this and
>> a small another adjustment). But because You suspend it until 0.22, I'll
>> send a new patch for DeviceN support when You'll have the time to work
>> on it.
> I'm not sure that i understand this sentence. Should i merge the cmyksupp.diff
> you sent in the other mail or not?
Yes, You should definitely merge it. The other mail was a bugfix for the 
CMYK support, NOT for the DeviceN support which I mentioned here. But I 
have to fix it in the DeviceN support, too, which I already have done 
(and tested), but I will not upload additional changes for the DeviceN 
support until You'll have the time to work on it.

Thomas
>
> Albert
>
>> Cheers,
>> Thomas
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>>     Albert
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Thomas
>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>>      Albert
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> poppler mailing list
>>>>> poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
>>>>>
>>>>> .
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> poppler mailing list
>>> poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
>>>
>>> .
>> _______________________________________________
>> poppler mailing list
>> poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
> _______________________________________________
> poppler mailing list
> poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
>
> .
>