[poppler] Adding a Beta 3 to 0.20?

[Thomas Freitag]

Am 09.04.2012 22:29, schrieb Thomas Freitag:
> Am 09.04.2012 22:02, schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
>> El Dilluns, 9 d'abril de 2012, a les 20:59:54, Thomas Freitag va 
>> escriure:
>>> Am 02.04.2012 23:33, schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
>>>> El Divendres, 30 de març de 2012, a les 10:49:25, Thomas Freitag va
>> escriure:
>>>>> Am 29.03.2012 22:15, schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
>>>>>> As you all see i just released poppler 0.19.2 as the schedule 
>>>>>> mandated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This means that theoretically the feature freeze is upon us.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to ask for a Beta 3 in two weeks (i.e. effectively 
>>>>>> delaying
>>>>>> the release of 0.20 by two weeks) so we could sneak in two 
>>>>>> features that
>>>>>> are done as of today but have not been released as part of 0.19.2 
>>>>>> since
>>>>>> *I* did not have time to review them properly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The features are I want to include in Beta 3 are:
>>>>>>     * Fabio's annot work
>>>>>>     * My form-reset work
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Opinions?
>>>>> If nobody cares about it, do You think You'll have the time to 
>>>>> look at
>>>>> the DeviceN support in splash, too? It's a quite huge patch, so I
>>>>> wouldn't care if You want to wait until the release of 0.20... But 
>>>>> it is
>>>>> worth the effort, see i.e. the attached examples from the ghent 
>>>>> group.
>>>>> To clearify what it means, I open a new thread and mail a beta 
>>>>> release
>>>>> of the patch.
>>>> After having a look at the patch I'd prefer to defer it to 0.22, 
>>>> the patch
>>>> is huge and most importantly touches crucial parts of the code (aka 
>>>> Gfx*
>>>> and Splash) while Fabio's and my patches are much more less core 
>>>> (annots
>>>> and forms refinements).
>>>>
>>>> I hope it's ok for you.
>>> The just uploaded patch for the CMYK support also infects the DeviceN
>>> support, because it's a copy&  paste there (and need therefore this and
>>> a small another adjustment). But because You suspend it until 0.22, 
>>> I'll
>>> send a new patch for DeviceN support when You'll have the time to work
>>> on it.
>> I'm not sure that i understand this sentence. Should i merge the 
>> cmyksupp.diff
>> you sent in the other mail or not?
> Yes, You should definitely merge it. The other mail was a bugfix for 
> the CMYK support, NOT for the DeviceN support which I mentioned here. 
> But I have to fix it in the DeviceN support, too, which I already have 
> done (and tested), but I will not upload additional changes for the 
> DeviceN support until You'll have the time to work on it.
Sorry, I fear, my formulation was still misunderstandable, I try a 
better one:

Just commit the patch from the other mail. It is a bugfix for the CMYK 
support. I will upload a new patch for the DeviceN support when You'll 
have the time to work on it. So here (for DeviceN support), it's just a 
hint that the DeviceN support patch was buggy in this area, too.

Cheers,
Thomas
>
> Thomas
>>
>> Albert
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>>     Albert
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      Albert
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> poppler mailing list
>>>>>> poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> poppler mailing list
>>>> poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
>>>>
>>>> .
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> poppler mailing list
>>> poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
>> _______________________________________________
>> poppler mailing list
>> poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
>>
>> .
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> poppler mailing list
> poppler at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
>
> .
>