[poppler] PDF 2.0 Spec (answer from FSFE)

[Albert Astals Cid]

El diumenge, 10 de març de 2019, a les 12:59:15 CET, Germán Poo-Caamaño va escriure:
> On Sun, 2019-03-10 at 12:15 +0100, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El dimecres, 6 de març de 2019, a les 20:58:14 CET, William Bader va
> > escriure:
> > > > I guess the question is also, would those orgs accept us as
> > > > members? I mean i may not have any issue being part of X but why
> > > > would X want me if i am really not part of their community?
> > > 
> > > Don't all of those groups have major packages that depend on
> > > poppler?
> > 
> > Sure, but most of those organizations have requirements in their by-
> > laws about which people can be accepted, like "needs to have N
> > commits to prject" or something similar.
> 
> I think the right question is: How many (and who are) developers who
> might need access to the draft that are not already a member of any
> foundation?
> 
> AFAIK, you are (or were) a KDE e.V. member. So, it is not an issue for
> you. For who that would be an issue?

Yes I am a member of KDE e.V. 

I think what Tobias meant was that only one organization would pay those 750€ and we'd all join that organization. 

But as said I'm not sure that'd work, i.e. I don't personally have a problem joining the GNOME Foundation, but i am not sure if that'd be at all possible without some kind of weird exception on how the GNOME Foundation members are usually chosen/approved/accepted (and the same way for you and KDE e.V. i think) 

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
>