[poppler] PDF 2.0 Spec (answer from FSFE)

[Germán Poo-Caamaño]

On Sun, 2019-03-10 at 12:15 +0100, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El dimecres, 6 de març de 2019, a les 20:58:14 CET, William Bader va
> escriure:
> > > I guess the question is also, would those orgs accept us as
> > > members? I mean i may not have any issue being part of X but why
> > > would X want me if i am really not part of their community?
> > 
> > Don't all of those groups have major packages that depend on
> > poppler?
> 
> Sure, but most of those organizations have requirements in their by-
> laws about which people can be accepted, like "needs to have N
> commits to prject" or something similar.

I think the right question is: How many (and who are) developers who
might need access to the draft that are not already a member of any
foundation?

AFAIK, you are (or were) a KDE e.V. member. So, it is not an issue for
you. For who that would be an issue?

-- 
Germán Poo-Caamaño
http://calcifer.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/poppler/attachments/20190310/adb3136e/attachment.sig>