[Portland] PortlandVFSProposal
Martin Konold
martin.konold at erfrakon.de
Sat Jan 7 21:17:44 EET 2006
Am Samstag, 7. Januar 2006 10:21 schrieb nf2:
Hi,
> If the
> layering would have been done correctly there wouldn't be a necessity
> for project portland, RuDI,...
Portland and RuDI have a much larger scope than only file i/o.
In general I believe that standardizing on interfaces or better protocolls is
much better with regards to future innovation compared to standardizing on
implementation.
BTW: Is your proposal synchronous or asynchronous?
Regards,
-- martin
--
http://www.erfrakon.com/
Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker
More information about the Portland
mailing list