[Portland] Transport mechanism

[Kevin Krammer]

On Friday 03 March 2006 14:05, nf2 wrote:

> 3) But then there is the problem that dbus has different
> language/toolkit/main loop bindings (for glib, Qt,..). Which makes it
> hard to have a single standardized C-API...

In the case of DBUS this is irrelevant.
The services would be described in either a format like the ones currently 
used by dapi or libdapii, or the DBUS introspection format.

In either case one can generate access libraries in any language as well, or 
just use the most suitable bindings and let its toolset generate the 
application code.

Cheers,
Kevin

-- 
Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer at gmx.at>
Qt/KDE Developer, Debian User
Moderator: www.mrunix.de (German), www.qtcentre.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/portland/attachments/20060304/ccc2d439/attachment.pgp