[pulseaudio-tickets] [PulseAudio] #899: atomic, programmable interface?
PulseAudio
trac-noreply at tango.0pointer.de
Thu Aug 18 02:31:36 PDT 2011
#899: atomic, programmable interface?
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: danutz | Owner: tanuk
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Milestone: | Component: daemon
Resolution: | Keywords:
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment(by danutz):
Writing a program to control modules, sinks and sources should be a simple
task, on the par with calling pacmd / pactl manually. It currently isn't.
This is why I filed the ticket.
The dbus interface was, at the time this ticket was opened, not usable
(both in terms of stability and completeness). I don't know if this is
still the case.
In any case, there should be high-level language bindings (python, first
and foremost) for either libpulse or the pulse-dbus interface. See
previous comments.
--
Ticket URL: <http://pulseaudio.org/ticket/899#comment:6>
PulseAudio <http://pulseaudio.org/>
The PulseAudio Sound Server
More information about the pulseaudio-bugs
mailing list