[pulseaudio-tickets] [PulseAudio] #896: Ignore lowest mixer level, via settings
PulseAudio
trac-noreply at tango.0pointer.de
Mon Jan 24 11:48:24 PST 2011
#896: Ignore lowest mixer level, via settings
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: danutz | Owner: lennart
Type: enhancement | Status: reopened
Milestone: | Component: module-alsa-*
Resolution: | Keywords:
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment(by tanuk):
Replying to [comment:8 danutz]:
> When someone writes "This is an alsa bug, perhaps in the kernel and
perhaps in lib alsa", when should I expect a possible fix to arrive in my
distro (i.e. in my apt-get upgrade)?
Unless someone has promised to fix the issue, I'd expect it to be never
fixed.
> When someone writes "I recently helped fixed this exact same issue for
my HDA card", how localized (code-line-wise) do you expect the issue to
be?
I expect it to be very localized. I don't know if it is, though - I don't
know how quirks are implemented in alsa drivers. I'm not sure I understood
your question exactly right, though - I don't quite see how localization
is related to the quote.
> And, finally, when a dialogue like the one between Raymond and yalo
takes place (sorry, it's impossible to find the link anymore, somehow both
Alsa and Pulse's bug tracking systems seem to hide from Google -- I've
spent 50 minutes trying to find the thing) who else do you expect to join
the discussion?
From what I've heard, the alsa developers are not following their bug
tracker very closely, which is unfortunate (I know Raymond follows it, but
he sure isn't the hda maintainer, and I don't know if he's an alsa
developer at all). It may be best to send mail to the alsa-devel list, or
to contact your distribution's audio maintainers. In this case it would be
useful to get an opinion from some distribution(s) anyway about this
workaround - if they really would want this kind of a hack in alsa or
pulseaudio, that might increase the motivation of the developers to work
on this.
Submitting patches is the most effective way of getting issues fixed - I
think the pulseaudio maintainers would accept a patch that would implement
what you propose (I'm not 100% sure, though).
--
Ticket URL: <http://pulseaudio.org/ticket/896#comment:9>
PulseAudio <http://pulseaudio.org/>
The PulseAudio Sound Server
More information about the pulseaudio-bugs
mailing list