[pulseaudio-tickets] [PulseAudio] #899: atomic, programmable interface?
PulseAudio
trac-noreply at tango.0pointer.de
Mon Jan 24 15:50:34 PST 2011
#899: atomic, programmable interface?
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: danutz | Owner: lennart
Type: defect | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: daemon
Keywords: |
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
I see no decent way except pactl and pacmd to control Pulse. How about an
atomic interface, DBus or pythonic or otherwhise? Non-atomic shell control
by pulsectl and pulsecmd is not acceptable -- pulse doesn't even have a
parseable output option !
--
Ticket URL: <http://pulseaudio.org/ticket/899>
PulseAudio <http://pulseaudio.org/>
The PulseAudio Sound Server
More information about the pulseaudio-bugs
mailing list