[pulseaudio-tickets] [PulseAudio] #899: atomic, programmable interface?

PulseAudio trac-noreply at tango.0pointer.de
Mon Jan 24 23:50:25 PST 2011


#899: atomic, programmable interface?
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  danutz       |       Owner:  tanuk   
      Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  assigned
 Milestone:               |   Component:  daemon  
Resolution:               |    Keywords:          
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by tanuk):

  * owner:  lennart => tanuk
  * status:  new => assigned
  * type:  defect => enhancement


Comment:

 I assume that libpulse is not "decent" for your purposes. A D-Bus
 interface implementation has been started in git master. I don't know when
 it will be finished. I will probably be the one who will finish it, though
 (it would be great if someone else would help, but I don't see that
 happening). I don't think I'll have time for that in the near future due
 to school, but in May, at latest, I should start working more actively on
 Pulseaudio. My first priority is to review stuff that is pending review,
 and the second priority is the D-Bus interface.

 The current implementation is actually usable already (see
 http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/DBusInterface), but the interface is not final
 yet, so it shouldn't be used unless you don't care if your programs break
 when changes are made in pulseaudio.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://pulseaudio.org/ticket/899#comment:1>
PulseAudio <http://pulseaudio.org/>
The PulseAudio Sound Server


More information about the pulseaudio-bugs mailing list