[pulseaudio-discuss] 61ms delay in pa_simple_write()
jeremy at nickurak.ca
Fri Sep 24 12:58:02 PDT 2010
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:19, Tomasz Torcz <tomek at pipebreaker.pl> wrote:
> Has qemu informed PA about required latency? There's an API for that.
That's a really hard piece of information to provide, in general at the
VM-level, because various applications inside the VM may require different
That said, this makes me wonder if the idea of virtualizing a sound card
isn't the right approach here, and instead, the pulse clients (be they
native or via the alsa pulse plugin) should be contacting a pulseaudio
server on the host? Would it be more feasible to manage latency this way?
Jeremy Nickurak -= Email/XMPP: -= jeremy at nickurak.ca =-
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss