[pulseaudio-discuss] 61ms delay in pa_simple_write()

Jeremy Nickurak jeremy at nickurak.ca
Sat Sep 25 08:59:13 PDT 2010

I would point out that there is a infrastructure in the latest qemu
repository to allow a shared memory region between the host and the guest:

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 13:58, Jeremy Nickurak <jeremy at nickurak.ca> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:19, Tomasz Torcz <tomek at pipebreaker.pl> wrote:
>>  Has qemu informed PA about required latency?  There's an API for that.
> That's a really hard piece of information to provide, in general at the
> VM-level, because various applications inside the VM may require different
> latency guarantees.
> That said, this makes me wonder if the idea of virtualizing a sound card
> isn't the right approach here, and instead, the pulse clients (be they
> native or via the alsa pulse plugin) should be contacting a pulseaudio
> server on the host? Would it be more feasible to manage latency this way?
> --
> Jeremy Nickurak -= Email/XMPP: -= jeremy at nickurak.ca =-

Jeremy Nickurak -= Email/XMPP: -= jeremy at nickurak.ca =-
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20100925/12e24d64/attachment.htm>

More information about the pulseaudio-discuss mailing list