[pulseaudio-discuss] Fighting rewinds / pulseaudio crash - update

David Henningsson david.henningsson at canonical.com
Mon Jan 31 02:46:15 PST 2011

On 2011-01-31 10:41, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> Thanks for the update David :)

You're welcome :-)

>> PulseAudio #1 and #2: I believe these should be applied to PulseAudio
>> upstream.
> OK, I think you've given it sufficient testing and exposer to confirm
> this. Can I just ask if these are "safe" if the corresponding gst fixes
> are not committed? (i.e. will GST generally bork or should it cope as
> well as currently without it's patches?)

Both are optimisations - gst patch only will be better than no patch at 
all, and PA patch only will be better than no patch at all. Most people 
will see it solved by either patch, but I guess that there are machines 
so slow that you'll need both.

 > Also, master only or master+s-q
 > (I'm personally favouring the latter).

Me too.

David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.

More information about the pulseaudio-discuss mailing list