[pulseaudio-discuss] Google ChromeOS reinventing the wheel, ignoring PulseAudio

Rémi Denis-Courmont remi at remlab.net
Tue Sep 27 08:02:16 PDT 2011


Le mardi 27 septembre 2011 17:27:14 Arun Raghavan, vous avez écrit :
> Do you have any more details? Seems to be more of a policy daemon than
> an audio server.

Isn't audio policy daemon just a fancier name for (modern) audio server?
Does PulseAudio not implement audio policy?

Sure, PulseAudio certainly does not police video devices. That's partly done 
by the X server (XVideo grabs), partly by the window manager, but mostly not 
done at all.

But still...

-- 
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/
http://fi.linkedin.com/in/remidenis


More information about the pulseaudio-discuss mailing list