[pulseaudio-discuss] pa_once can run twice?
frederic.dalleau at intel.com
Thu Apr 26 07:19:10 PDT 2012
> Right, so it's a trade-off between keeping a mutex allocated for my version,
> and three extra atomic ops for your version. Maybe it doesn't matter much
> and we're essentially bikeshedding?
Good question, but I don't like to let an issue pending. This is haunting me and
I can't find how to sleep until it is fixed. And it eventually explode
a few months later
into my face.
> That looks slightly more elegant than our solutions IMO.
Agreed, but the multiplatform abstraction make it not easy to use.
More information about the pulseaudio-discuss