[pulseaudio-discuss] Transitioning from pa_bool_t to C99 bool

rong deng dzrongg at gmail.com
Thu Jul 5 00:19:21 PDT 2012


2012/7/2 David Henningsson <david.henningsson at canonical.com>:
> I don't think there is any reason to not do s/pa_bool_t/bool/g. Probably the
> reason for this might be historical, as some compilers may have supported
> some C99 features but not all of them (Microsoft compilers come to mind).

Does pulseaudio work on Windows? If it doesn't work at all, why should
we bother ;)


More information about the pulseaudio-discuss mailing list