[pulseaudio-discuss] Transitioning from pa_bool_t to C99 bool

[Arun Raghavan]

On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 15:19 +0800, rong deng wrote:
> 2012/7/2 David Henningsson <david.henningsson at canonical.com>:
> > I don't think there is any reason to not do s/pa_bool_t/bool/g. Probably the
> > reason for this might be historical, as some compilers may have supported
> > some C99 features but not all of them (Microsoft compilers come to mind).
> 
> Does pulseaudio work on Windows? If it doesn't work at all, why should
> we bother ;)

It does. :) People use it for streaming, and there's also a waveout
sink/source.

-- Arun