[pulseaudio-discuss] Transitioning from pa_bool_t to C99 bool

rong deng dzrongg at gmail.com
Thu Jul 5 00:29:34 PDT 2012


2012/7/5 Arun Raghavan <arun.raghavan at collabora.co.uk>:
> On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 15:19 +0800, rong deng wrote:
>> 2012/7/2 David Henningsson <david.henningsson at canonical.com>:
>> > I don't think there is any reason to not do s/pa_bool_t/bool/g. Probably the
>> > reason for this might be historical, as some compilers may have supported
>> > some C99 features but not all of them (Microsoft compilers come to mind).
>>
>> Does pulseaudio work on Windows? If it doesn't work at all, why should
>> we bother ;)
>
> It does. :) People use it for streaming, and there's also a waveout
> sink/source.

Great. It's good to know.


More information about the pulseaudio-discuss mailing list