[pulseaudio-discuss] Heads-up: the routing patches will start to get merged soon

[Tanu Kaskinen]

On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 15:50 +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
> On 04/04/2014 11:31 AM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > I'm heading towards "a generic solution to our current routing issues",
> > but that solution will depend on Murphy, which will provide the
> > configurability and the default routing rules. In my opinion,
> > implementing another solution with good configurability and
> > better-than-current default routing without Murphy should be implemented
> > by someone else, if a non-Murphy-based solution is desired.
> 
> (Just summing up what we discussed on IRC)
> 
> So the result from all this work is that normal desktop users will get
> nothing, except an API and quite some infrastructure to maintain.
> 
> > If I understood correctly, you wish that I'd implement a full generic
> > non-Murphy-based solution before merging the node infrastructure, but
> > it's unclear to me whether that wish is a minimum requirement or not,
> > and if it's not, what's the minimum requirement? 
> 
> I'm not sure what to answer to this question right now. I'd like to hear
> what others have to say as well.

Others were silent, so in the absence of permission from you to do
anything else I think I'll have to work with the assumption that I will
need to provide some kind of configurable non-Murphy-based routing
module before the routing infrastructure can be accepted to master.

-- 
Tanu