[pulseaudio-discuss] Heads-up: the routing patches will start to get merged soon

[David Henningsson]

On 2014-04-17 12:41, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 15:50 +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
>> On 04/04/2014 11:31 AM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
>>> I'm heading towards "a generic solution to our current routing issues",
>>> but that solution will depend on Murphy, which will provide the
>>> configurability and the default routing rules. In my opinion,
>>> implementing another solution with good configurability and
>>> better-than-current default routing without Murphy should be implemented
>>> by someone else, if a non-Murphy-based solution is desired.
>>
>> (Just summing up what we discussed on IRC)
>>
>> So the result from all this work is that normal desktop users will get
>> nothing, except an API and quite some infrastructure to maintain.
>>
>>> If I understood correctly, you wish that I'd implement a full generic
>>> non-Murphy-based solution before merging the node infrastructure, but
>>> it's unclear to me whether that wish is a minimum requirement or not,
>>> and if it's not, what's the minimum requirement?
>>
>> I'm not sure what to answer to this question right now. I'd like to hear
>> what others have to say as well.
>
> Others were silent, so in the absence of permission from you to do
> anything else I think I'll have to work with the assumption that I will
> need to provide some kind of configurable non-Murphy-based routing
> module before the routing infrastructure can be accepted to master.

Well, I'd much prefer to hear more opinions about it. It's difficult for 
me to know as well.

-- 
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
https://launchpad.net/~diwic