[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] Add a .travis.yml for Travis CI

Felipe Sateler fsateler at debian.org
Mon Apr 20 06:00:06 PDT 2015

On 20 April 2015 at 04:34, Arun Raghavan <arun at accosted.net> wrote:
> On 20 April 2015 at 07:12, Mihai Moldovan <ionic at ionic.de> wrote:
>> On 20.04.2015 03:26 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> Travis by default only sends mails on broken builds, and the first
>>> successful built after a broken one.
>> I have only experience with Jenkins, and concerning this feature, both
>> system sound about equal. With Jenkins, it's one mail per build job type
>> and that can get quite nasty if having multiple build jobs for multiple
>> distros for multiple architectures.
>>> Moreover, travis does not try
>>> every commit, but only push commits. So volume should not be an issue.
>>> Is there any reason you think this would be a bad idea?
>> I think it's an issue exactly because of the (potential) volume, the
>> message sizes (if [truncated] build logs are attached) and the general
>> lack of being useful for users/discussions.
>> The -commits mailing list sounds like a more appropriate place for this
>> sort of auto-generated information.
>> Despite for developers working on PA directly, those messages will
>> mostly be needless spam.
> Summarising conversation on IRC:
> * I think it'd be low-traffic enough to not matter -- I'm fine with
> sending the mails to the -discuss or -commits list
> * David prefers not using the -discuss list for automated mails, and
> suggested either a -travis list, or reusing -commits
> * I'm not too keen to have another list, so I prefer -commits in this case

David also mentioned -bugs. I think it makes more sense, given that
breaking the build or test suite is arguably a bug. What is the real
address for -bugs? I only read it through gmane.


Felipe Sateler

More information about the pulseaudio-discuss mailing list